SARS-CoV-2 infection, hospitalization, and mortality in adults with and without cancer
Hosseini-Moghaddam SM, Shepherd FA, Swayze S, Kwong JC, Chan KKW. JAMA Netw Open. 2023; 6(8):e2331617. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
Objective — To determine the association between vasectomy and prostate cancer, adjusting for measures of health seeking behaviour.
Design — Population based matched cohort study.
Setting — Multiple validated healthcare databases in Ontario, Canada, 1994-2012.
Participants — 326 607 men aged 20 to 65 who had undergone vasectomy were identified through physician billing codes and matched 1:1 on age (within two years), year of cohort entry, comorbidity score, and geographical region to men who did not undergo a vasectomy.
Main Outcomes Measures — The primary outcome was incident prostate cancer. Secondary outcomes were prostate cancer related grade, stage, and mortality.
Results — 3462 incident cases of prostate cancer were identified after a median follow-up of 10.9 years: 1843 (53.2%) in the vasectomy group and 1619 (46.8%) in the non-vasectomy group. In unadjusted analysis, vasectomy was associated with a slightly increased risk of incident prostate cancer (hazard ratio 1.13, 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 1.20). After adjustment for measures of health seeking behaviour, however, no association remained (adjusted hazard ratio 1.02, 95% confidence interval 0.95 to 1.09). Moreover, no association was found between vasectomy and high grade prostate cancer (adjusted odds ratio 1.05, 95% confidence interval 0.67 to 1.66), advanced stage prostate cancer (adjusted odds ratio 1.04, 0.81 to 1.34), or mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 1.06, 0.60 to 1.85).
Conclusion — The findings do not support an independent association between vasectomy and prostate cancer.
Nayan M, Hamilton RJ, Macdonald EM, Li Q, Mamdani MM, Earle CC, Kulkarni GS, Jarvi KA, Juurlink DN. BMJ. 2016; 355:i5546.
The ICES website uses cookies. If that’s okay with you, keep on browsing, or learn more about our Privacy Policy.