Emergency department visits for minor illnesses among recent refugee and immigrant children
Wanigaratne S, Brandenberger J, Lu H, Stukel TA, Odugbemi T, Glazier R, Rayner J, Guttmann A. JAMA Netw Open. 2026; 9(2): e2560070.
Aims — To determine the test characteristics of algorithms using hospitalization and physician claim data to predict gestational diabetes (GDM).
Methods — Using population-level healthcare administrative data, we identified all pregnant women in Ontario in 2019. The presence of GDM was determined based on glucose screening laboratory results. Algorithms using hospitalization records and/or physician claims were tested against this gold standard. The selected algorithm was applied to administrative data records from 1999 to 2019 to determine GDM prevalence in each year.
Results — Identifying GDM based on either a diabetes mellitus code on the delivery hospitalization record, OR at least 1 physician claim with a diabetes diagnosis code with a 90 day lookback before delivery yielded a sensitivity of 95.9%, specificity of 99.2%, and positive predictive value of 87.6%. The prevalence of GDM increased from 4.2% of pregnancies in 1999 to 12.0% in 2019.
Conclusions — Algorithms using hospitalization or physician claims administrative data can accurately identify GDM
Shah BR, Booth GL, Feig DS, Lipscombe LL. Can J Diabetes. 2023; 47(1):25-30. Epub 2022 Jul 9.
The ICES website uses cookies. If that’s okay with you, keep on browsing, or learn more about our Privacy Policy.