Maternal disability and emergency department use for infants
Brown HK, Lunsky Y, Fung K, Santiago-Jimenez M, Camden A, Cohen E, Ray JG, Saunders NR, Telner D, Varner CE, Vigod SN, Zwicker J, Guttmann A. JAMA Netw Open. 2025; 8(5):e258549.
Aims — To examine whether income-related disparities in glycaemic control decline after the age of 65 years, when publicly funded universal drug insurance is acquired.
Methods — We conducted a population-based cross-sectional study using linked administrative healthcare databases. Adults with diabetes, aged 40-89 years, with available HbA1c data were included (N=716 297). Income was based on median neighbourhood household income. Multiple linear regression was used to test for effect modification of age ≥65 years on the relationship between income and HbA1c.
Results — There was a significant inverse association between income and HbA1c level. After adjusting for baseline factors, the effect of income on HbA1c level was significantly greater for individuals aged < 65 years (mean difference HbA1c for lowest vs highest income group +2.5 mmol/mol, 95% CI +2.3 to +2.7 [+0.23%, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.24]) than for those aged > 65 years (+1.2 mmol/mol, 95% CI +1.0 to +1.3 [+0.11%, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.12]; P<0.0001 for interaction).
Conclusions — Despite universal access to healthcare, people with diabetes on lower incomes had significantly worse glycaemic control compared with their counterparts on higher incomes. However, income gradients in glycaemic control were markedly reduced after the age of 65 years, possibly as a result of access to prescription drug coverage.
Branfield Day L, Austin PC, Shah BR. Diabet Med. 2020; 37(5):822-7. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
The ICES website uses cookies. If that’s okay with you, keep on browsing, or learn more about our Privacy Policy.