Machine learning identifies clusters of multimorbidity among decedents with inflammatory bowel disease
Postill G, Harish V, Itanyi IU, Tang F, Buajitti E, Kuenzig ME, Rosella LC, Benchimol EI. Commun Med (Lond). 2025; 5(1):476.
Ilimumab is an anti-CTLA4 monoclonal antibody with demonstrated efficacy for metastatic melanoma in randomized controlled trials, including in the first-line setting. Population-based outcomes directly compared with historic chemotherapy treatment in metastatic or unresectable melanoma are lacking. Using population-based data from the province of Ontario, the benefit of first-line ipilimumab was estimated by comparing outcomes of patients treated with first-line dacarbazine over the period 2007–2009 with patients treated over the period 2010–2015 with first-line ipilimumab. Cutaneous and noncutaneous cases were included. The administrative data set utilized was high-dimensional; meaning, there was a large number of variables relative to the sample size. To adjust for important confounders among the many available variables, we utilized a double-selection method, a modified machine learning algorithm to extract the important variables that were related to both survival times and treatment usage. Time-dependent treatment modeling was utilized. Among the 2793 melanoma patients receiving palliative treatment (systemic therapy, surgery, or radiation) in Ontario (2007–2015), there were 289 patients treated with first-line ipilimumab (2010–2015) and 175 patients treated with first-line dacarbazine (2007–2009). For first-line ipilimumab, the adjusted hazard ratio compared with dacarbazine for overall survival (OS) was 0.63 (95% confidence interval: 0.47–0.84) with a 1-year survival of 46.5 versus 18.9% with dacarbazine. In subgroup analysis, ipilimumab was associated with improved OS across groups (age, sex, comorbidity, income quintile, previous interferon). First-line ipilimumab was found to have a significant OS benefit compared with historical controls in a population including those patients not routinely included in clinical trials. The treatment effect was similar to randomized controlled trials, suggesting a meaningful benefit when utilized in a population-based setting.
Drysdale E, Peng Y, Nguyen P, Baetz T, Hanna TP. Melanoma Res. 2019; 29(6):635-42. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
The ICES website uses cookies. If that’s okay with you, keep on browsing, or learn more about our Privacy Policy.