Go to content

The effect of tracheostomy timing during critical illness on long-term survival


Background — Tracheostomy is common in intensive care unit patients, but the appropriate timing is controversial.

Objective — To determine whether earlier tracheostomy is associated with greater long-term survival.

Design — Retrospective cohort analysis.

Setting — Acute care hospitals in Ontario, Canada (n = 114).

Patients — All mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients who received tracheostomy between April 1, 1992 and March 31, 2004, excluding extreme cases (<2 or ≥28 days) and children (<18 yrs).

Measurements — For crude analyses, tracheostomy timing was classified as early (≤10 days) vs. late (>10 days) with mortality measured at multiple follow-up intervals. Proportional hazards analyses considered tracheostomy as a time-dependent variable to adjust for measurable confounders and possible survivor treatment bias. We used stratification, propensity score, and instrumental variable analyses to adjust for patient differences.

Results — A total of 10,927 patients received tracheostomy during the study, of which one-third (n = 3758) received early and two-thirds late (n = 7169). Patients receiving early tracheostomy had lower unadjusted 90-day (34.8% vs. 36.9%; p = 0.032), 1 yr (46.5% vs. 49.8%; p = 0.001), and study mortality (63.9% vs. 67.2%; p < 0.001) than patients receiving late tracheostomy. Multivariable analyses treating tracheostomy as a time-dependent variable showed that each additional delay of 1 day was associated with increased mortality (hazard ratio 1.008, 95% confidence interval 1.004–1.012), equivalent to an increase in 90-day mortality from 36.2% to 37.6% per week of delay (relative risk increase 3.9%; number needed to treat, 71 patients to save one life per week delay).

Limitations — This analysis provides guidance regarding timing but not patient selection for tracheostomy.

Conclusions — Physicians performing early tracheostomy should not anticipate a large potential survival benefit. Future research should concentrate on identifying which patients will receive the most benefit.



Scales DC, Thiruchelvam D, Kiss A, Redelmeier DA. Crit Care Med. 2008; 36(9):2547-57.

Contributing ICES Scientists

Research Programs

Associated Sites