Home Contact Sitemap
About Us Publications Work In Progress Education and Events Privacy Information for Scientists  


Aboriginal People (10)
Asthma (49)
Cancer (184)
Cardiovascular (444)
Continuity of Care (28)
Decision-Making (53)
Diabetes (146)
Diagnostic Testing (74)
Drugs (394)
Emergency Services (122)
Ethics (10)
Geriatrics (173)
Health Economics (73)
Health Human Resources (54)
Health Policy (135)
Health Technology Assessment (22)
Home Care (20)
Mental Health (85)
Methods (155)
Miscellaneous/Other (20)
Musculoskeletal (78)
Nephrology (37)
Neurology (40)
Outcomes (257)
Pediatrics (130)
Performance Measurement (49)
Population Health (117)
Primary Care (156)
Privacy (6)
Resource Utilization (109)
Respiratory (61)
Screening (59)
Stroke (84)
Surgery (113)
Urology (12)
Vascular (17)
Waiting Lists (44)
Women's Health (135)
 
  View publications
  |




Implementation of electronic medical records: Theory-informed qualitative study

Greiver M, Barnsley J, Glazier RH, Moineddin R, Harvey BJ. Implementation of electronic medical records: Theory-informed qualitative study. Can Fam Physician.  2011; 57 (10): e390-e397.

Objective — To apply the diffusion-of-innovations theory to the examination of factors that are perceived by family physicians as influencing the implementation of electronic medical records (EMRs).


Design —
Qualitative study with 2 focus groups 18 months after EMR implementation; participants also took part in a concurrent quantitative study examining EMR implementation and preventive services.


Setting —
Toronto, Ont.


Participants —
Twelve community-based family physicians.


Methods — 
The researchers employed a semistructured interview guide. The interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim; 2 researchers independently categorized and coded the transcripts and then met to compare and contrast their findings, category mapping, and interpretations. Findings were then mapped to an existing theoretical framework.


Main findings —
Multiple barriers to EMR implementation were described. These included lack of relative advantage for many processes, high complexity of the system, low compatibility with physician needs and past experiences, difficulty with adaptation of the EMR to the organization and adaptation of the organization to the EMR, and lack of organizational slack. Positive factors were the presence of a champion and relative advantages for some processes.


Conclusion —
Early EMR implementation experience is consistent with theoretical concepts associated with implementation of innovations. A problematic implementation process helps to explain, at least in part, the lack of improvement in preventive services in our quantitative results.


About Us Publications Work In Progress Education and Events Privacy Information for Scientists  

Copyright© 1992-2011 Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES)

Terms of Use
ICES logo - Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES) Home Page ICES Home Page Link Sitemap: Can't find what you are looking for? Click here for a list of webpages available to you.