Home Contact Sitemap
About Us Publications Work In Progress Education and Events Privacy Information for Scientists  


Aboriginal People (10)
Asthma (50)
Cancer (185)
Cardiovascular (444)
Continuity of Care (28)
Decision-Making (53)
Diabetes (146)
Diagnostic Testing (74)
Drugs (394)
Emergency Services (122)
Ethics (10)
Geriatrics (173)
Health Economics (73)
Health Human Resources (54)
Health Policy (135)
Health Technology Assessment (22)
Home Care (20)
Mental Health (86)
Methods (155)
Miscellaneous/Other (20)
Musculoskeletal (78)
Nephrology (37)
Neurology (40)
Outcomes (257)
Pediatrics (130)
Performance Measurement (49)
Population Health (117)
Primary Care (156)
Privacy (6)
Resource Utilization (109)
Respiratory (62)
Screening (59)
Stroke (84)
Surgery (113)
Urology (12)
Vascular (17)
Waiting Lists (44)
Women's Health (136)
 
  View publications
  |




Cost and quality: evidence from Ontario long-term care hospitals

Wodchis W, Teare G, Anderson G. Cost and quality: evidence from Ontario long-term care hospitals. Med Care.  2007; 45 (10): 981-988.

Although both quality and cost are important concerns for long-term care (LTC) facility management and policy, the relationship between cost and quality is poorly understood.  Such knowledge is necessary to guide facility management and policy action.

 

The authors sought to determine the net effect of quality on cost in LTC hospital settings.  A four-year panel dataset from April 1997 through March 2002 comprising observations from 99 LTC hospitals were included in this analysis.

 

The authors examined the relationship between direct resident costs and seven indicators of quality for long-stay residents.  They used panel data methods to control for unobserved facility-level characteristics.

 

It was found that increases in restraint use and incident pressure/skin ulcers were associated with lower per diem costs, whereas incontinence prevalence was associated with higher per diem costs.

 

The results point to different implications regarding cost and quality for different quality indicators.  Although facilities have a strong internal business case to improve quality in incontinence, policy makers may need to provide financial incentives to encourage reductions in restraint use and incident skin ulcers so as to defray potential higher costs associated with improving quality in these areas.


About Us Publications Work In Progress Education and Events Privacy Information for Scientists  

Copyright© 1992-2011 Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES)

Terms of Use
ICES logo - Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES) Home Page ICES Home Page Link Sitemap: Can't find what you are looking for? Click here for a list of webpages available to you.