Home Contact Sitemap
About Us Publications Work In Progress Education and Events Privacy Information for Scientists  


Aboriginal People (10)
Asthma (49)
Cancer (184)
Cardiovascular (444)
Continuity of Care (28)
Decision-Making (53)
Diabetes (146)
Diagnostic Testing (74)
Drugs (394)
Emergency Services (122)
Ethics (10)
Geriatrics (173)
Health Economics (73)
Health Human Resources (54)
Health Policy (135)
Health Technology Assessment (22)
Home Care (20)
Mental Health (85)
Methods (155)
Miscellaneous/Other (20)
Musculoskeletal (78)
Nephrology (37)
Neurology (40)
Outcomes (257)
Pediatrics (130)
Performance Measurement (49)
Population Health (117)
Primary Care (156)
Privacy (6)
Resource Utilization (109)
Respiratory (61)
Screening (59)
Stroke (84)
Surgery (113)
Urology (12)
Vascular (17)
Waiting Lists (44)
Women's Health (135)
 
  View publications
  |




Pediatric hodgkin lymphoma: maximizing efficacy and minimizing toxicity

Hodgson D, Hudson M, Constine L. Pediatric hodgkin lymphoma: maximizing efficacy and minimizing toxicity. Semin Radiat Oncol.  2007; 17 (3): 230-242.

Historically, both adult and childhood Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) were treated with full-dose (35-45 Gy) extended-field radiation therapy (RT).  Although this treatment was the first to produce reliable disease control, the resulting late toxicity led pediatric oncologists to pioneer the use of combined chemotherapy and low-dose (15-25 Gy) involved-field RT for all stages of HL. 

 

Currently, standard treatment of childhood HL is risk-adapted; those with favorable risk disease typically receive two to four cycles of multi-agent chemotherapy with low-dose IFRT, whereas those with higher-risk disease receive more intensive chemotherapy before IFRT.  This approach produces long-term survival rates >90% while limiting exposure to anthracyclines, alkylators, and radiation to normal tissues.  In contrast to adult HL, IFRT remains an important component of the treatment of advanced-stage HL in pediatric patients. 

 

Current clinical trials for children with HL aim to further segregate patients into risk strata such that those who are highly curable can receive less toxic therapy, whereas high-risk patients can receive augmented therapy.  Response-adapted therapy, in which overall treatment intensity is modified according to the initial response to chemotherapy, is emerging as a potential means of further reducing therapy for some while maintaining high cure rates.  The challenge is to refine therapy in a rare disease in which long-time intervals are necessary to observe an adequate number of events (treatment failure or late effects) to answer judicious questions.


About Us Publications Work In Progress Education and Events Privacy Information for Scientists  

Copyright© 1992-2011 Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES)

Terms of Use
ICES logo - Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES) Home Page ICES Home Page Link Sitemap: Can't find what you are looking for? Click here for a list of webpages available to you.