Home Contact Sitemap
About Us Publications Work In Progress Education and Events Privacy Information for Scientists  


Aboriginal People (10)
Asthma (50)
Cancer (185)
Cardiovascular (444)
Continuity of Care (28)
Decision-Making (53)
Diabetes (146)
Diagnostic Testing (74)
Drugs (394)
Emergency Services (122)
Ethics (10)
Geriatrics (173)
Health Economics (73)
Health Human Resources (54)
Health Policy (135)
Health Technology Assessment (22)
Home Care (20)
Mental Health (86)
Methods (155)
Miscellaneous/Other (20)
Musculoskeletal (78)
Nephrology (37)
Neurology (40)
Outcomes (257)
Pediatrics (130)
Performance Measurement (49)
Population Health (117)
Primary Care (156)
Privacy (6)
Resource Utilization (109)
Respiratory (62)
Screening (59)
Stroke (84)
Surgery (113)
Urology (12)
Vascular (17)
Waiting Lists (44)
Women's Health (136)
 
  View publications
  |




Anticoagulation control in the peri-hospitalization period

van Walraven C, Forster A. Anticoagulation control in the peri-hospitalization period. J Gen Intern Med.  2007; Mar 31 (Epub ahead of print):

Oral anticoagulants (OAC) are effective and safe if the international normalized ratio (INR) is maintained within a narrow therapeutic range.  Hospitalization is independently associated with poor anticoagulation control.  The objective of this study is to describe how anticoagulation control changes in the peri-hospitalization period.

 

This study is a retrospective cohort study using population-based administrative databases.  INR results were retrieved from a population-based laboratory database.  INR levels between laboratory measures were estimated using linear interpolation.  Auto-regressive, integrated, moving average (ARIMA) time-series modeling was used to determine how anticoagulation control changed in the peri-hospitalization period.  The study included 5,380 elderly patients in Eastern Ontario between September 1, 1999 and September 1, 2000 taking OACs.

 

Results showed that 951 (17.7%) were hospitalized during the OAC therapy [thrombotic, n=52 (1.0%); hemorrhagic, n=140 (2.6%); other hospitalization types, n=759 (14.1%)].  All measures of anticoagulation control changed significantly in the peri-hospitalization period.  Before hemorrhagic admissions, mean INR and proportion with INR >5 increased significantly (daily increase 0.024, P=.03 and 0.2%, P=.01).  Following other hospitalization types, the proportion of patients with INR < 1.5 was significantly increased (daily increase 0.19%, P=.02).

 

Patients admitted to the hospital for a variety of indications have significantly worse anticoagulation control in the peri-hosptialization period.  Anticoagulated patients discharged after medical hospitalizations could be targeted for improved anticoagulation control.


About Us Publications Work In Progress Education and Events Privacy Information for Scientists  

Copyright© 1992-2011 Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES)

Terms of Use
ICES logo - Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES) Home Page ICES Home Page Link Sitemap: Can't find what you are looking for? Click here for a list of webpages available to you.